Energy - Key to the Future
Yes, the USA is approaching Greenland. Although, actually they say to fight against China. But what do they want with the raw materials from Greenland? Ultimately, from coal, gas and rare earths only the latter are left as
raw materials. And whatever else you would find there.
For the world around the eternal yesterday people, it is now a matter of no longer trying to confront them with arguments. Let's be honest, when has discussion with such people ever achieved anything?
But there is a kind of miracle cure to get them to change their ways. It is the miracle of modern energy production. Many problems, including wars, could be prevented with it. In the USA, you can use a middle-aged
technique as long as until others prove that it is more effective in a modern way.
If the continent of Africa manages to get enough almost free energy from the sky, then it might one day prosper (without corruption). If one of the last in the chain of wealth suddenly starts to rise, then the others suddenly
wake up.
At the moment the world seems to be interested in Argentina simply because a man with a saw and clearly right-wing views is taking control of government spending. That shouldn't be the case. The people with more
democratic attitudes should actually have the say.
And how is that supposed to work? Clearly, by joining forces and ensuring more growth. No, the growth expected here is not meant to increase prosperity even more. That will encourage (dangerous) refugee movements
even more.
This fatal method of leaving the good ones here or recruiting them and turning everyone else away. Who then paid for the education and now feels exploited? This cements the division of the world, which seems to be
resulting in more and more armed conflicts.
Yes, of course, the sun shines much more often and more strongly in Africa than here, but there is a lack of investment to get the energy from the sky. The Chinese have probably understood this and are investing. But
should the world recover from China's actions, and should their policies become more widespread?
Don't we need to compete with them more determinedly, but not like the USA, just securing their raw materials. In the long run, we are only in a phase of transition. At some point, demand will drop rapidly thanks to smart
recycling.
For example, by saturating the market with e-cars, from which at least 95 percent of new e-cars must then be produced. However, it would be wise to agree soon on a few materials for the construction of batteries,
otherwise we will end up with 50 percent sodium and 50 percent lithium heaps, even though we actually only need sodium.
Of course, this is not the time to freeze military spending, but if the vast majority of conflicts have economic causes, then there is already a lever there that can free us in the long term from the threat that is apparently
rampant around the world.
No, an island of prosperity in a slum, that doesn't work, even if the two are a little further away from each other. Let's get ahead of the right-wingers by showing that aid to the gate of free energy is far superior to their
solutions with oil, coal and gas, especially economically.
| 
